This building

Is awesome.

It is referenced in the Vanity Fair article linked below.

http://www.globalconstructionwatch.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/cctv-2.jpg

“The design of the new Central Chinese Television (CCTV) headquarters defies the popular conception of a skyscraper — and it broke Beijing’s building codes and required approval by a special review panel. The standard systems for engineering gravity and lateral loads in buildings didn’t apply to the CCTV building, which is formed by two leaning towers, each bent 90 degrees at the top and bottom to form a continuous loop.

The engineer’s solution is to create a structural “tube” of diagonal supports. The irregular pattern of this “diagrid” system reflects the distribution of forces across the tube’s surface. Designed by Rem Koolhaas and Ole Scheeren and engineered by Ove Arup, the new CCTV tower rethinks what a skyscraper can be.”

This is amazing.  Modern and postmodern, form follows function, but you can literally see the forces on the building.  I am completely enthralled with this thing.  The irregular grid on the building’s facades is an expression of the forces traveling throughout its structure. I like the word expression.

The other cool aspect–as the author in the VF article pointed out, there is a slight nod to communism– is how in this skyscraper the relationship between individuals is completely different.  Unlike a traditional skyscraper, in which you can usually not see any other part of the building, the CCTV tower gives its denizens a sense of their surroundings, of the building itself and of the other people with which they are working.  The architecture creates a relationship among those within, as opposed to a verticle stack of disconnectness.

The architects also mentioned how the building is not overwhelming.  It can be broken down into three distinct building which are easily visually digestable, and b/c it is only 47 stories the viewer does not have to crane to see to the top.

China: Figuring their shit out.  more pics

himay
July 16th, 2008 1:10 pm

China: Figuring Their Shit Out
is the title of a book about China I would read

Get on it, Trev. Stat.

July 16th, 2008 4:40 pm

The thing about this building and the other buildings in Trev’s previous post is that they are something to inspire towards. Good architecture gives a society more than comfort, shelter, and a general ambiance. It instills a sense of awe and wonder in people. This is one reason why cathedrals generally great architecture.

A great building is being built a lot closer to home. Check out the Kauffman Center in downtown Kansas City.
Image of the Kauffman Center
I love this building. Part of me wishes I worked in the area just so I could watch it being built. I for one will go see a performance there just to check out the building.

On the other hand, there is the Oread Inn being build next to the KU campus. While it is not an ugly building, it is tired and done. It would have been nice if the developers and the residence of Lawrence could look past our preconceived notions of our city’s architectural style and built something modern and fresh. Ho hum.

trevor
July 16th, 2008 4:45 pm

That’s one of the points of the VF article. Tired societies make tired buildings. The Chinese, where they are right now, are at the point where they can take a fucking chance. Where there sense of themselves and the limitless world in front of them demands it.

They are in the middle of creating their century. I loved the comparisons between New York 1900 and Beijing now.

Dare to be great, all of that stuff.

trevor
July 16th, 2008 4:47 pm

I have to disagree about the Oread, however. Like the Lofts downtown, I remember when Brett pointed them out to me. What are they trying to say, what are they trying to do.

Is that “late capitalist decadent decline?”

You must be logged in to post a comment.